60 seconds for Selwyn survey

From 5-21 June, we asked our community what they thought Selwyn should do and what matters most in our '60 seconds for Selwyn' survey. 

There was a total of 6,900 submissions made to our survey. Below are the overall results of our survey, along with a breakdown of the choices made by each town across the district.

  • 46% of responses asked Council to explore both amalgamating with other neighbouring councils, and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority*, before making a decision.
  • 34% of responses asked Council to only explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
  • Rural and urban voices were closely aligned in the numbers wanting to explore amalgamation and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority AND those who only wanted Council to explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
  • Responders care deeply about maintaining local identity, keeping decision-making close to home, and ensuring services remain affordable and reliable.
  • Concerns about rates, growth pressures, and protecting rural communities were also recurring themes.

*Unitary authorities are organisations that have the functions of both regional councils and territorial authorities (city/district councils). You can read more information on our dedicated FAQ page.

Here’s who told us what they think in the survey:

  • The survey had strong participation from working-age ratepayers, predominantly from Rolleston and Lincoln.
  • 32% of responses were from people living rurally.
  • Communities from Arthur’s Pass to Rakaia Huts had their say on what matters most.
  • The survey had a high level of engagement (41% provided written feedback).

Which option do you think Selwyn should explore as part of the Government’s Head Start reforms?


If local government structural changes go ahead, which THREE issues would matter most to you for the future of Selwyn?


Themes identified from your written feedback


Arthur's Pass - 25 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
12 (48%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
2 (8%)
Explore both
8 (32%)
Neither option
3 (12%)

Burnham - 59 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
6 (10.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
24 (40.7%)
Explore both
24 (40.7%)
Neither option
5 (8.5%)

Castle Hill - 35 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
11 (31.4%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
9 (25.7%)
Explore both
14 (40.0%)
Neither option
1 (2.9%)

Coalgate - 51 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
4 (7.8%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
14 (27.5%)
Explore both
23 (45.1%)
Neither option
10 (19.6%)

Darfield - 495 submissions (7%)

Explore Amalgamation
47 (9.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
167 (33.7%)
Explore both
240 (48.5%)
Neither option
41 (8.3%)

Doyleston - 44 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
7 (15.9%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
11 (25.0%)
Explore both
22 (50.0%)
Neither option
4 (9.1%)

Dunsandel - 75 submissions (1%)

Explore Amalgamation
11 (14.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
26 (34.7%)
Explore both
34 (45.3%)
Neither option
4 (5.3%)

Glentunnel - 33 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
4 (12.1%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
8 (24.2%)
Explore both
20 (60.6%)
Neither option
1 (3%)

Hororata - 72 submissions (1%)

Explore Amalgamation
9 (12.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
27 (37.5%)
Explore both
33 (45.8%)
Neither option
3 (4.2%)

Kirwee - 168 submissions (2.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
16 (9.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
68 (40.5%)
Explore both
69 (41.1%)
Neither option
15 (8.9%)

Lake Coleridge - 15 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
2 (13.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
4 (26.7%)
Explore both
9 (60.0%)
Neither option
0 (0.0%)

Leeston - 279 submissions (4%)

Explore Amalgamation
35 (12.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
98 (35.1%)
Explore both
124 (44.4%)
Neither option
22 (7.9%)

Lincoln - 1134 submissions (16.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
172 (15.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
344 (30.3%)
Explore both
568 (50.1%)
Neither option
50 (4.4%)

Prebbleton - 495 submissions (7%)

Explore Amalgamation
94 (19.0%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
152 (30.7%)
Explore both
222 (44.8%)
Neither option
27 (5.5%)

Rakaia Huts - 18 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
1 (5.6%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
5 (27.8%)
Explore both
11 (61.1%)
Neither option
1 (5.6%)

Rolleston - 2491 submissions (36%)

Explore Amalgamation
304 (12.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
872 (35.0%)
Explore both
1139 (45.7%)
Neither option
176 (7.1%)

Sheffield - 57 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
7 (12.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
25 (43.9%)
Explore both
24 (42.1%)
Neither option
1 (1.8%)

Southbridge - 111 Submissions (1.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
12 (10.8%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
47 (42.3%)
Explore both
43 (38.7%)
Neither option
9 (8.1%)

Springfield - 51 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
2 (3.9%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
19 (37.3%)
Explore both
22 (43.1%)
Neither option
8 (15.7%)

Springston - 131 submissions (2%)

Explore Amalgamation
18 (13.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
42 (32.1%)
Explore both
59 (45.0%)
Neither option
12 (9.2%)

Tai Tapu - 175 submissions (2.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
32 (18.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
47 (26.9%)
Explore both
81 (46.3%)
Neither option
15 (8.6%)

Waddington - 22 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
1 (4.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
10 (45.5%)
Explore both
8 (36.4%)
Neither option
3 (13.6%)

West Melton - 572 submissions (8.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
61 (10.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
227 (39.7%)
Explore both
246 (43.0%)
Neither option
38 (6.6%)

Whitecliffs - 41 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
5 (12.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
13 (31.7%)
Explore both
20 (48.8%)
Neither option
3 (7.3%)

Other - 251 submissions (3.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
39 (15.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
84 (33.5%)
Explore both
111 (44.2%)
Neither option
17 (6.8%)

What's next, Selwyn?

Between 16 and 26 July we asked what the community thinks should be next for Selwyn in a short, three question survey about the future structure of local government. Analysis of the results shows that the majority of respondents thought that Selwyn District should become a unitary authority.

Selwyn's Options

Community-supported option

Option 1: Selwyn Unitary Authority
2,342 responses (58%)

Selwyn District becomes a unitary authority. This means in addition to district council functions (e.g. roading and water) Selwyn would also be responsible for some regional functions in the area. This option would require Selwyn to work with other unitary councils to perform all regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.

Read more detail on this option

Decorative photo

Option 2: Mid Canterbury Unitary Authority (Selwyn & Ashburton)
967 responses (24%)

Selwyn and Ashburton districts combine to form a single unitary authority, taking on some of Environment Canterbury's current functions across both areas. This option would require the new council to work with other unitary councils to perform some regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.

Read more detail on this option

Decorative photo

Option 3: Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri & Hurunui Unitary Authority
726 responses (18%)

A unitary authority bringing together Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri and Hurunui into one central unitary authority. This option may require the new unitary to work with other unitary councils to perform all regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.

Read more detail on this option

How do each of the options compare?

How do the options compare

 

Selwyn Unitary Authority

Mid Canterbury Unitary Authority (Selwyn & Ashburton)

Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri & Hurunui Unitary Authority

Population (2025)

87,600

125,000

593,370

Projected Population (2053)

159,900

204,700

774,750

Current Rateable Units (houses)

35,831

52,198

260,066

GDP

$4,346.6m

$7,404m

$44,879m*

Debt

$295m

$439m

$3,337m

GDP per Rateable unit

$121,308

$141,845

$172,568*

Debt per rateable unit

$8,233

$8,410

$12,831

Total Revenue

$253m

$361m

$1,705m

Geographic Area

6,553 km2

12,742 km2

18,670 km2

*Uses 2024 data for Hurunui District