Community Surveys
60 seconds for Selwyn survey
From 5-21 June, we asked our community what they thought Selwyn should do and what matters most in our '60 seconds for Selwyn' survey.
There was a total of 6,900 submissions made to our survey. Below are the overall results of our survey, along with a breakdown of the choices made by each town across the district.
- 46% of responses asked Council to explore both amalgamating with other neighbouring councils, and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority*, before making a decision.
- 34% of responses asked Council to only explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
- Rural and urban voices were closely aligned in the numbers wanting to explore amalgamation and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority AND those who only wanted Council to explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
- Responders care deeply about maintaining local identity, keeping decision-making close to home, and ensuring services remain affordable and reliable.
- Concerns about rates, growth pressures, and protecting rural communities were also recurring themes.
*Unitary authorities are organisations that have the functions of both regional councils and territorial authorities (city/district councils). You can read more information on our dedicated FAQ page.
Here’s who told us what they think in the survey:
- The survey had strong participation from working-age ratepayers, predominantly from Rolleston and Lincoln.
- 32% of responses were from people living rurally.
- Communities from Arthur’s Pass to Rakaia Huts had their say on what matters most.
- The survey had a high level of engagement (41% provided written feedback).
Which option do you think Selwyn should explore as part of the Government’s Head Start reforms?
If local government structural changes go ahead, which THREE issues would matter most to you for the future of Selwyn?
Themes identified from your written feedback
Arthur's Pass - 25 submissions (<1%)
12 (48%)
2 (8%)
8 (32%)
3 (12%)
Burnham - 59 submissions (<1%)
6 (10.2%)
24 (40.7%)
24 (40.7%)
5 (8.5%)
Castle Hill - 35 submissions (<1%)
11 (31.4%)
9 (25.7%)
14 (40.0%)
1 (2.9%)
Coalgate - 51 submissions (<1%)
4 (7.8%)
14 (27.5%)
23 (45.1%)
10 (19.6%)
Darfield - 495 submissions (7%)
47 (9.5%)
167 (33.7%)
240 (48.5%)
41 (8.3%)
Doyleston - 44 submissions (<1%)
7 (15.9%)
11 (25.0%)
22 (50.0%)
4 (9.1%)
Dunsandel - 75 submissions (1%)
11 (14.7%)
26 (34.7%)
34 (45.3%)
4 (5.3%)
Glentunnel - 33 submissions (<1%)
4 (12.1%)
8 (24.2%)
20 (60.6%)
1 (3%)
Hororata - 72 submissions (1%)
9 (12.5%)
27 (37.5%)
33 (45.8%)
3 (4.2%)
Kirwee - 168 submissions (2.5%)
16 (9.5%)
68 (40.5%)
69 (41.1%)
15 (8.9%)
Lake Coleridge - 15 submissions (<1%)
2 (13.3%)
4 (26.7%)
9 (60.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Leeston - 279 submissions (4%)
35 (12.5%)
98 (35.1%)
124 (44.4%)
22 (7.9%)
Lincoln - 1134 submissions (16.5%)
172 (15.2%)
344 (30.3%)
568 (50.1%)
50 (4.4%)
Prebbleton - 495 submissions (7%)
94 (19.0%)
152 (30.7%)
222 (44.8%)
27 (5.5%)
Rakaia Huts - 18 submissions (<1%)
1 (5.6%)
5 (27.8%)
11 (61.1%)
1 (5.6%)
Rolleston - 2491 submissions (36%)
304 (12.2%)
872 (35.0%)
1139 (45.7%)
176 (7.1%)
Sheffield - 57 submissions (<1%)
7 (12.3%)
25 (43.9%)
24 (42.1%)
1 (1.8%)
Southbridge - 111 Submissions (1.5%)
12 (10.8%)
47 (42.3%)
43 (38.7%)
9 (8.1%)
Springfield - 51 submissions (<1%)
2 (3.9%)
19 (37.3%)
22 (43.1%)
8 (15.7%)
Springston - 131 submissions (2%)
18 (13.7%)
42 (32.1%)
59 (45.0%)
12 (9.2%)
Tai Tapu - 175 submissions (2.5%)
32 (18.3%)
47 (26.9%)
81 (46.3%)
15 (8.6%)
Waddington - 22 submissions (<1%)
1 (4.5%)
10 (45.5%)
8 (36.4%)
3 (13.6%)
West Melton - 572 submissions (8.5%)
61 (10.7%)
227 (39.7%)
246 (43.0%)
38 (6.6%)
Whitecliffs - 41 submissions (<1%)
5 (12.2%)
13 (31.7%)
20 (48.8%)
3 (7.3%)
Other - 251 submissions (3.5%)
39 (15.5%)
84 (33.5%)
111 (44.2%)
17 (6.8%)
What's next, Selwyn?
Between 16 and 26 July we asked what the community thinks should be next for Selwyn in a short, three question survey about the future structure of local government. Analysis of the results shows that the majority of respondents thought that Selwyn District should become a unitary authority.
Selwyn's Options
Community-supported option
![]() |
Option 1: Selwyn Unitary Authority
Selwyn District becomes a unitary authority. This means in addition to district council functions (e.g. roading and water) Selwyn would also be responsible for some regional functions in the area. This option would require Selwyn to work with other unitary councils to perform all regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.
|
|
|
Option 2: Mid Canterbury Unitary Authority (Selwyn & Ashburton)
Selwyn and Ashburton districts combine to form a single unitary authority, taking on some of Environment Canterbury's current functions across both areas. This option would require the new council to work with other unitary councils to perform some regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.
|
|
|
Option 3: Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri & Hurunui Unitary Authority
A unitary authority bringing together Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri and Hurunui into one central unitary authority. This option may require the new unitary to work with other unitary councils to perform all regional functions currently managed by Environment Canterbury.
|
How do each of the options compare?
How do the options compare
Selwyn Unitary Authority | Mid Canterbury Unitary Authority (Selwyn & Ashburton) | Selwyn, Christchurch, Waimakariri & Hurunui Unitary Authority | |
Population (2025) | 87,600 | 125,000 | 593,370 |
Projected Population (2053) | 159,900 | 204,700 | 774,750 |
Current Rateable Units (houses) | 35,831 | 52,198 | 260,066 |
GDP | $4,346.6m | $7,404m | $44,879m* |
Debt | $295m | $439m | $3,337m |
GDP per Rateable unit | $121,308 | $141,845 | $172,568* |
Debt per rateable unit | $8,233 | $8,410 | $12,831 |
Total Revenue | $253m | $361m | $1,705m |
Geographic Area | 6,553 km2 | 12,742 km2 | 18,670 km2 |
*Uses 2024 data for Hurunui District


