Government Reforms

Local Government reforms and amalgamation

On 5 May, the Government announced a voluntary process for territorial authorities (like Selwyn) to reform and reorganise before the wider reform of local government and disestablishment of regional councils (ECAN) from 2028. This process is called the Head Start pathway.

Councils can either merge with other neighbouring councils, or become a ‘unitary authority’ by taking on the functions currently delivered by regional councils such as ECAN.

If councils don’t pursue the Head Start pathway, the Government will decide what happens through a compulsory backstop process after the 2028 local government elections.

The purpose is to simplify local government through fewer councils covering larger responsibilities and areas of the country.

From 5-21 June, we asked our community what they think Selwyn should do and what matters most in our '60 seconds for Selwyn' survey. Here’s what you told us across nearly 7,000 responses:

  • 46% of responses asked Council to explore both amalgamating with other neighbouring councils, and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority*, before making a decision.
  • 34% of responses asked Council to only explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
  • Rural and urban voices were closely aligned in the numbers wanting to explore amalgamation and becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority AND those who only wanted Council to explore becoming a Selwyn-based unitary authority.
  • Responders care deeply about maintaining local identity, keeping decision-making close to home, and ensuring services remain affordable and reliable.
  • Concerns about rates, growth pressures, and protecting rural communities were also recurring themes.

*Unitary authorities are organisations that have the functions of both regional councils and territorial authorities (city/district councils). You can read more information on our dedicated FAQ page.

Here’s who told us what they think in the survey:

  • The survey had strong participation from working-age ratepayers, predominantly from Rolleston and Lincoln.
  • 32% of responses were from people living rurally.
  • Communities from Arthur’s Pass to Rakaia Huts had their say on what matters most.
  • The survey had a high level of engagement (41% provided written feedback).

What's next?

  • Staff will continue analysing the survey results and preparing further detailed advice for Councillors.
  • A public Council meeting on 15 July will see staff and Councillors work through the next steps on the Council’s Head Start proposal.
  • Councillors will consider this work before confirming a preferred direction in a public meeting on 5 August.
  • Councillors and the Mayor will continue to work closely with the Canterbury Mayoral Forum on discussions and the work ahead.
  • Any proposal will continue to be shaped by community feedback before being submitted to Government on 7 August, with more community input planned from mid-July in a similar quick, accessible format.

Key documents


60 seconds for Selwyn survey results

There was a total of 6,900 submissions made to our survey. Thanks to all of you who took a moment to submit. Below are the overall results of our survey, along with a breakdown of the choices made by each town across the district.

Which option do you think Selwyn should explore as part of the Government’s Head Start reforms?


If local government structural changes go ahead, which THREE issues would matter most to you for the future of Selwyn?


Themes identified from your written feedback


Breakdown by town/area

Arthur's Pass - 25 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
12 (48%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
2 (8%)
Explore both
8 (32%)
Neither option
3 (12%)

Burnham - 59 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
6 (10.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
24 (40.7%)
Explore both
24 (40.7%)
Neither option
5 (8.5%)

Castle Hill - 35 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
11 (31.4%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
9 (25.7%)
Explore both
14 (40.0%)
Neither option
1 (2.9%)

Coalgate - 51 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
4 (7.8%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
14 (27.5%)
Explore both
23 (45.1%)
Neither option
10 (19.6%)

Darfield - 495 submissions (7%)

Explore Amalgamation
47 (9.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
167 (33.7%)
Explore both
240 (48.5%)
Neither option
41 (8.3%)

Doyleston - 44 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
7 (15.9%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
11 (25.0%)
Explore both
22 (50.0%)
Neither option
4 (9.1%)

Dunsandel - 75 submissions (1%)

Explore Amalgamation
11 (14.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
26 (34.7%)
Explore both
34 (45.3%)
Neither option
4 (5.3%)

Glentunnel - 33 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
4 (12.1%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
8 (24.2%)
Explore both
20 (60.6%)
Neither option
1 (3%)

Hororata - 72 submissions (1%)

Explore Amalgamation
9 (12.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
27 (37.5%)
Explore both
33 (45.8%)
Neither option
3 (4.2%)

Kirwee - 168 submissions (2.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
16 (9.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
68 (40.5%)
Explore both
69 (41.1%)
Neither option
15 (8.9%)

Lake Coleridge - 15 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
2 (13.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
4 (26.7%)
Explore both
9 (60.0%)
Neither option
0 (0.0%)

Leeston - 279 submissions (4%)

Explore Amalgamation
35 (12.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
98 (35.1%)
Explore both
124 (44.4%)
Neither option
22 (7.9%)

Lincoln - 1134 submissions (16.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
172 (15.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
344 (30.3%)
Explore both
568 (50.1%)
Neither option
50 (4.4%)

Prebbleton - 495 submissions (7%)

Explore Amalgamation
94 (19.0%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
152 (30.7%)
Explore both
222 (44.8%)
Neither option
27 (5.5%)

Rakaia Huts - 18 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
1 (5.6%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
5 (27.8%)
Explore both
11 (61.1%)
Neither option
1 (5.6%)

Rolleston - 2491 submissions (36%)

Explore Amalgamation
304 (12.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
872 (35.0%)
Explore both
1139 (45.7%)
Neither option
176 (7.1%)

Sheffield - 57 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
7 (12.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
25 (43.9%)
Explore both
24 (42.1%)
Neither option
1 (1.8%)

Southbridge - 111 Submissions (1.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
12 (10.8%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
47 (42.3%)
Explore both
43 (38.7%)
Neither option
9 (8.1%)

Springfield - 51 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
2 (3.9%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
19 (37.3%)
Explore both
22 (43.1%)
Neither option
8 (15.7%)

Springston - 131 submissions (2%)

Explore Amalgamation
18 (13.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
42 (32.1%)
Explore both
59 (45.0%)
Neither option
12 (9.2%)

Tai Tapu - 175 submissions (2.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
32 (18.3%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
47 (26.9%)
Explore both
81 (46.3%)
Neither option
15 (8.6%)

Waddington - 22 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
1 (4.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
10 (45.5%)
Explore both
8 (36.4%)
Neither option
3 (13.6%)

West Melton - 572 submissions (8.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
61 (10.7%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
227 (39.7%)
Explore both
246 (43.0%)
Neither option
38 (6.6%)

Whitecliffs - 41 submissions (<1%)

Explore Amalgamation
5 (12.2%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
13 (31.7%)
Explore both
20 (48.8%)
Neither option
3 (7.3%)

Other - 251 submissions (3.5%)

Explore Amalgamation
39 (15.5%)
Explore becoming a unitary authority
84 (33.5%)
Explore both
111 (44.2%)
Neither option
17 (6.8%)

Local Government Reform: How it all fits together

Resource Management Act Reform
Resource Management Act Reform
Rates Capping
Rates Capping
Development Levies
Development Levies
Emergency Management Bill
Emergency Management Bill
Simplifying Local Government
Simplifying Local Government
Local Government (Systems Improvement) Bill
Local Government (Systems Improvement) Bill
Public Works Act
Public Works Act
Building System Reform
Building System Reform
Head Start Pathway FAQs
Head Start Pathway FAQs

Much of the detail is still emerging and we will keep this site updated as well as regular updates from Mayor Lydia. We will share what we know, when we know it, and be transparent about what is not yet clear.

Our submissions will also be published here, and each section contains links to make your own submissions to central government. Here’s a great explainer on how to make a submission.

Every submission helps build a more complete picture of the issues that matter to Selwyn communities, and your perspective offers a distinct and valuable contribution. Thank you for being part of the conversation.


Timeline of reforms

5-21 June 2026

60 seconds for Selwyn survey

22 June-15 July 2026

Council reviews feedback and takes proposals to neighbouring councils

15 July 2026

Public Council meeting on proposal next steps

5 August 2026

Public Council meeting to confirm preferred direction

7 August 2026

Selwyn submits its Head Start proposal to Government

September 2026

Cabinet agrees proposals in principle

March 2027

Final proposals submitted

May 2027

Cabinet confirms proposals and makes final policy decisions

Late 2027

Cabinet approves legislation

Early 2028

Legislation is enacted

May 2028

Proposal implementation begins

Nominations for local elections

October 2028

Local elections

Regional councillors will be replaced with an interim body (for example, a board of mayors, Crown commissioners, or a combination of both)


Stay in the loop

We will keep this page updated as more information becomes available. Please check back regularly for updates, and don’t hesitate to share your feedback or questions with us.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates.

More information / Resources:

Our thanks to Simpson Grierson News and Insights section which was used as a source for content on the page.

RMA reform:

Rates capping / Simplifying Local Government:

Development Levies:

Local Government New Zealand explainers: